Cruise: 49UF20101002 (dataset:GLODAPv2.2020.NEW) Data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Synonyms (including errata!) for this cruise: ks201007; ks201007; 49UF20101002; Section:PT;
IMPORTANT information for GLODAP Reference Group Editors: This adjustment is a published version for GLODAPv2.2020!
Please wait while loading list of related files
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
Redfield.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/adjustments!] |
View | |
TSmap.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/adjustments!] |
View |
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
Weighted_Mean_Results.xlsx | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/adjustments!] |
||
Weighted_Mean_Results.xlsx |
Plot/Data files re. Parameter(s) (select parameter on left side to view!):
cruise:4
nitrate:13
oxygen:6
ph:2
phosphate:6
salinity:8
silicate:4
tco2:1
- no files! -
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
318M20040615_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
325019931005_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
325020040424_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
33RR20050617_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
492S19941101_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49EW19940115_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49K619940107_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by salinity in subject)
49UF20101002 - salinity
Very variable region and only limited depth of data, hence very large
uncertainty in analysis (error bars more than 2x larger than range);
No reliable conclusion possible.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-04 11:44:27 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
49UP20120410_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by tco2 in subject)
49UF20101002 - tco2
Only two station are part of the crs-analysis.;
MLR analysis due to "split" location of cruise not trustworthy. Not enough for a
2nd QC.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-04 11:46:47 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
View comment(s) (filtered by alkalinity in subject)
49UF20101002 - alkalinity
Adjust upward : RG meeting
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2020-06-10 14:50:24 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20101002 - alkalinity
No sign. Crs;
Seems ok though, but simply not enough for a 2nd QC.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-04 11:46:06 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
49UF20121024_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by ph in subject)
49UF20101002 - ph
Only one sign. crossover but located in Japanese Sea…., i.e. no crs-analysis
possible; Interconsistency std. deviation larger than offset.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-04 11:48:32 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20101002 - phosphate
Most (insignificant) crs compare to the (2) same stations….
The three significant crs indicate good accuracy though;
Maintain with doubts.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-04 11:44:56 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
318M20130321_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49K619940107_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49NZ20050525_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49NZ20140717_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49RY20110515_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49RY20120726_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49SH20081021_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UF20100414_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UF20121024_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UP20120410_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UP20120602_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UP20140703_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by nitrate in subject)
49UF20101002 - nitrate
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2020-03-16 13:04:35 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
318M20040615_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
325019931005_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49K619940107_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UP20070118_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UP20090916_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by phosphate in subject)
49UF20101002 - phosphate
Most (insignificant) crs compare to the (2) same stations….
The three significant crs indicate good accuracy though;
Maintain with doubts.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-04 11:44:56 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
318M20040615_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
325019931005_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UP20100514_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by silicate in subject)
49UF20101002 - silicate
Only two sign crs with large uncertainty - no reliable conclusion possible.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-04 11:47:08 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
318M20040615_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
325019931005_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
492S19941101_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49EW19940115_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49K619940107_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by oxygen in subject)
49UF20101002 - oxygen
Very large uncertainty due to shallow depth of the samples;
Fits very well to 318M20040615 though;
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-04 11:45:33 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
View 11 comment(s) (Lists all comments)
49UF20101002 - alkalinity
Adjust upward : RG meeting
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2020-06-10 14:50:24 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20101002
Following RG meeting and an internal Japanese Sea comparison adjustments have
been altered.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2020-04-07 11:21:42 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20101002 - nitrate
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2020-03-16 13:04:35 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20101002 - ph
Only one sign. crossover but located in Japanese Sea…., i.e. no crs-analysis
possible; Interconsistency std. deviation larger than offset.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-04 11:48:32 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20101002 - silicate
Only two sign crs with large uncertainty - no reliable conclusion possible.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-04 11:47:08 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20101002 - tco2
Only two station are part of the crs-analysis.;
MLR analysis due to "split" location of cruise not trustworthy. Not enough for a
2nd QC.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-04 11:46:47 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20101002 - alkalinity
No sign. Crs;
Seems ok though, but simply not enough for a 2nd QC.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-04 11:46:06 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20101002 - oxygen
Very large uncertainty due to shallow depth of the samples;
Fits very well to 318M20040615 though;
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-04 11:45:33 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20101002 - phosphate
Most (insignificant) crs compare to the (2) same stations….
The three significant crs indicate good accuracy though;
Maintain with doubts.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-04 11:44:56 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20101002 - salinity
Very variable region and only limited depth of data, hence very large
uncertainty in analysis (error bars more than 2x larger than range);
No reliable conclusion possible.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-04 11:44:27 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20101002 - initialized
Section:PT; Carbon PI:Hitomi Kamiya; Hydrography PI:Hitomi Kamiya; Oxygen
PI:Hitomi Kamiya; Nutrients PI:Hitomi Kamiya
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-04 08:19:35 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Hide comments