Cruise: 49UF20140206 (dataset:GLODAPv2.2020.NEW) Data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Synonyms (including errata!) for this cruise: ks201402; ks201402; 49UF20140206; non-GO-SHIP but on GO-SHIP line:P13, P04;
IMPORTANT information for GLODAP Reference Group Editors: This adjustment is a published version for GLODAPv2.2020!
Please wait while loading list of related files
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
Redfield.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/adjustments!] |
View | |
TSmap.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/adjustments!] |
View |
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
Weighted_Mean_Results.xlsx | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/adjustments!] |
||
Weighted_Mean_Results.xlsx |
Plot/Data files re. Parameter(s) (select parameter on left side to view!):
alkalinity:10
cruise:4
nitrate:9
oxygen:14
ph:9
phosphate:14
salinity:14
silicate:13
tco2:10
- no files! -
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
322019920816_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
32MW19890206_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49HG20000912_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49HH19910813_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49RY20110515_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UF20110205_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UF20120621_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UF20130203_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UF20130627_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UP20090117_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UP20110107_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UP20130109_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UP20150724_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by salinity in subject)
49UF20140206 - salinity
Accurate data. Note that the very large negative offsets are based upen only
500m (roughly 1500m - 2000m). Thus ignoring these is ok. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-04 14:50:20 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
322019920816_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
49HG20000912_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
49RY20110515_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
49UF20110205_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
49UF20120204_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
49UF20120621_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
49UF20130203_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
49UF20130627_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
49UP20150724_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by tco2 in subject)
49UF20140206 - tco2
Even though most crs show a slightly postive offset, there is by far not enough
evidence to supoort any adjustment. Data looks good. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-04 14:48:58 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
322019920816_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49HG20000912_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49RY20110515_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49UF20110205_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49UF20120204_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49UF20120621_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49UF20130203_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49UF20130627_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49UP20150724_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by alkalinity in subject)
49UF20140206 - alkalinity
Nice data set. Crs analysis indicates a good accuracy - analysis is very
trustworthy as many samples/crs exist with data deeper than 6000m and crs cover
entire range at all locations. Note that 49HG20000912 has recieved a +6mol/kg
pre-adjustment...Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-04 14:49:22 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
49HG20000912_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
49RY20110515_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
49UF20110205_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
49UF20120204_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
49UF20120621_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
49UF20130203_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
49UF20130627_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
49UP20150724_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by ph in subject)
49UF20140206 - ph
Even the deep crs show large standard deviations - nonetheless the means are
within the new range (+/- 0.1). The 2nd QC seems to be rather limited by the
available cruises of GLODAPv2.2019 in that region than the cruise-in-question.
Interconsistency check supports findings of crs analysis - both have a mean
offset of 0.006. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-04 14:51:00 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20140206 - phosphate
More than 95% of the crs show means within the acceptable range. Most of them
have slightly higher concentrations. By far not enough for an adjustment.
Accurate data. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-04 14:50:04 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
32MW19890206_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49HG20000912_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49RY20110515_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UF20130203_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UF20130627_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UP20120602_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UP20130109_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UP20150724_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by nitrate in subject)
49UF20140206 - nitrate
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2020-03-16 13:11:23 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
322019920816_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
32MW19890206_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49HG20000912_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49RY20110515_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UF20120204_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UF20120621_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UF20130203_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UF20130627_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UP20090117_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UP20110107_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UP20120111_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UP20130109_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UP20150724_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by phosphate in subject)
49UF20140206 - phosphate
More than 95% of the crs show means within the acceptable range. Most of them
have slightly higher concentrations. By far not enough for an adjustment.
Accurate data. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-04 14:50:04 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
322019920816_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
32MW19890206_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49HG20000912_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49RY20110515_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UF20110205_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UF20120204_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UF20120621_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UF20130627_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UP20090117_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UP20110107_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UP20130109_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UP20150724_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by silicate in subject)
49UF20140206 - silicate
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-04 14:50:31 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
322019920816_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
32MW19890206_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49HG20000912_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49HH19910813_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49RY20110515_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UF20120204_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UF20120621_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UF20130203_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UF20130627_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UP20090117_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UP20110107_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UP20130109_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UP20150724_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by oxygen in subject)
49UF20140206 - oxygen
Very accurate data. The crs with high standard deviation are due to the
restricted depth of the GLODAPv2.2019 cruise. Still almost all cruises
demonstrate nice fits. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-04 14:49:48 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
View 9 comment(s) (Lists all comments)
49UF20140206 - nitrate
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2020-03-16 13:11:23 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20140206 - ph
Even the deep crs show large standard deviations - nonetheless the means are
within the new range (+/- 0.1). The 2nd QC seems to be rather limited by the
available cruises of GLODAPv2.2019 in that region than the cruise-in-question.
Interconsistency check supports findings of crs analysis - both have a mean
offset of 0.006. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-04 14:51:00 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20140206 - silicate
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-04 14:50:31 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20140206 - salinity
Accurate data. Note that the very large negative offsets are based upen only
500m (roughly 1500m - 2000m). Thus ignoring these is ok. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-04 14:50:20 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20140206 - phosphate
More than 95% of the crs show means within the acceptable range. Most of them
have slightly higher concentrations. By far not enough for an adjustment.
Accurate data. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-04 14:50:04 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20140206 - oxygen
Very accurate data. The crs with high standard deviation are due to the
restricted depth of the GLODAPv2.2019 cruise. Still almost all cruises
demonstrate nice fits. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-04 14:49:48 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20140206 - alkalinity
Nice data set. Crs analysis indicates a good accuracy - analysis is very
trustworthy as many samples/crs exist with data deeper than 6000m and crs cover
entire range at all locations. Note that 49HG20000912 has recieved a +6mol/kg
pre-adjustment...Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-04 14:49:22 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20140206 - tco2
Even though most crs show a slightly postive offset, there is by far not enough
evidence to supoort any adjustment. Data looks good. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-04 14:48:58 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20140206 - initialized
non-GO-SHIP but on GO-SHIP line:P13, P04; Carbon PI:Kazuhiro Nemoto; Hydrography
PI:Kazuhiro Nemoto; Oxygen PI:Kazuhiro Nemoto; Nutrients PI:Kazuhiro Nemoto
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-04 08:19:34 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Hide comments