Cruise: 49UF20160107 (dataset:GLODAPv2.2020.NEW) Data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Synonyms (including errata!) for this cruise: ks201601; ks201601; 49UF20160107; non-GO-SHIP but on GO-SHIP line:P03; Section:OK, PN;
IMPORTANT information for GLODAP Reference Group Editors: This adjustment is a published version for GLODAPv2.2020!
Please wait while loading list of related files
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
Redfield.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/adjustments!] |
View | |
TSmap.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/adjustments!] |
View |
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
Weighted_Mean_Results.xlsx | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/adjustments!] |
||
Weighted_Mean_Results.xlsx |
Plot/Data files re. Parameter(s) (select parameter on left side to view!):
alkalinity:5
cruise:4
nitrate:9
oxygen:18
ph:4
phosphate:17
salinity:10
silicate:11
tco2:5
- no files! -
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
49NZ20051031_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UF20100524_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UF20120108_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UF20121024_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UF20130107_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UP20100417_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UP20101110_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UP20130619_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UP20130731_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by salinity in subject)
49UF20160107 - salinity
Huge variability and uncertainty given the restricted depth. However, more than
80% of the means are within the range. The weighted mean is also almost zero.
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-05 10:37:36 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
49NZ20051031_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
49UP20101110_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
49UP20130619_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
tco_MLR.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by tco2 in subject)
49UF20160107 - tco2
Following the reference group meeting there is enough support to let this pass
2ndQC without adjustments.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2020-04-01 17:35:05 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20160107 - tco2
Only three sign crs and the crs depend on only 3 stations of the
cruise-in-question. Deep average looks ok though, but MLR itself is also not
very reliable. Not enough for a 2nd QC.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-05 10:36:12 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
49NZ20051031_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49UP20101110_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49UP20130619_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
talk_MLR.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by alkalinity in subject)
49UF20160107 - alkalinity
Only three sign crs and 49UP20130619 could not been 2nd QC itself. Further the
crs depend on only 3 stations of the cruise-in-question. Deep average looks ok
though, but MLR itself is also not very reliable. Not enough for a 2nd QC.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-05 10:36:27 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
49NZ20051031_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
49UP20101110_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
49UP20130619_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by ph in subject)
49UF20160107 - ph
pH data seems to be rather high. But only three sign crs each based on only 3
stations. The interconsistency check also indicates a too high value (0.0215 +/-
0.0123). But both TA and TCO2 could also not been 2nd Qced. Not enough for a
robust conclusion.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-05 10:38:05 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20160107 - phosphate
Accurate data. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-05 10:37:18 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
49HG19971110_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49K619960620_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49NZ20051031_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UF20121024_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UF20130107_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UF20130412_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UP20130619_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UP20130731_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by nitrate in subject)
49UF20160107 - nitrate
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2020-03-16 13:20:11 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
325019850330_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49HG19971110_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49NZ20051031_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UF20100524_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UF20110108_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UF20120108_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UF20120429_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UF20120826_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UF20121024_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UF20130107_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UF20130412_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UP20100417_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UP20101110_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UP20111205_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UP20130619_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UP20130731_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by phosphate in subject)
49UF20160107 - phosphate
Accurate data. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-05 10:37:18 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
325019850330_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49NZ20051031_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UF20120429_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UF20121024_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UF20130107_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UP20100417_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UP20101110_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UP20111205_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UP20130619_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UP20130731_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by silicate in subject)
49UF20160107 - silicate
Accurate data. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-05 10:37:46 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
325019850330_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49HG19971110_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49K619960620_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49NZ20051031_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UF20100524_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UF20110108_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UF20120108_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UF20120429_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UF20120826_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UF20121024_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UF20130107_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UF20130412_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UP20100417_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UP20101110_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UP20111205_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UP20130619_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UP20130731_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by oxygen in subject)
49UF20160107 - oxygen
Even though crs offsets fall out of the range (below 0.99) as does the weighted
mean. Offsets seem to be rather artifacts of the interpolation method and the
offsets clearly decrease with depth. See examplariliy crs with 49UP20130619 and
with 49UF20121024. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-05 10:37:07 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
View 10 comment(s) (Lists all comments)
49UF20160107 - tco2
Following the reference group meeting there is enough support to let this pass
2ndQC without adjustments.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2020-04-01 17:35:05 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20160107 - nitrate
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2020-03-16 13:20:11 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20160107 - ph
pH data seems to be rather high. But only three sign crs each based on only 3
stations. The interconsistency check also indicates a too high value (0.0215 +/-
0.0123). But both TA and TCO2 could also not been 2nd Qced. Not enough for a
robust conclusion.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-05 10:38:05 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20160107 - silicate
Accurate data. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-05 10:37:46 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20160107 - salinity
Huge variability and uncertainty given the restricted depth. However, more than
80% of the means are within the range. The weighted mean is also almost zero.
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-05 10:37:36 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20160107 - phosphate
Accurate data. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-05 10:37:18 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20160107 - oxygen
Even though crs offsets fall out of the range (below 0.99) as does the weighted
mean. Offsets seem to be rather artifacts of the interpolation method and the
offsets clearly decrease with depth. See examplariliy crs with 49UP20130619 and
with 49UF20121024. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-05 10:37:07 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20160107 - alkalinity
Only three sign crs and 49UP20130619 could not been 2nd QC itself. Further the
crs depend on only 3 stations of the cruise-in-question. Deep average looks ok
though, but MLR itself is also not very reliable. Not enough for a 2nd QC.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-05 10:36:27 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20160107 - tco2
Only three sign crs and the crs depend on only 3 stations of the
cruise-in-question. Deep average looks ok though, but MLR itself is also not
very reliable. Not enough for a 2nd QC.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-05 10:36:12 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20160107 - initialized
non-GO-SHIP but on GO-SHIP line:P03; Section:OK, PN; Carbon PI:Kazuhiro Nemoto;
Hydrography PI:Kazuhiro Nemoto; Oxygen PI:Kazuhiro Nemoto; Nutrients PI:Kazuhiro
Nemoto
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-04 08:19:34 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Hide comments