Cruise: 49UF20160407 (dataset:GLODAPv2.2020.NEW) Data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Synonyms (including errata!) for this cruise: ks201604; 49UF20160407; ks201604; non-GO-SHIP but on GO-SHIP line:P03; Section:OK, PN; erratum:49UF20160408
IMPORTANT information for GLODAP Reference Group Editors: This adjustment is a published version for GLODAPv2.2020!
Please wait while loading list of related files
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
Redfield.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/adjustments!] |
View |
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
Weighted_Mean_Results.xlsx |
Plot/Data files re. Parameter(s) (select parameter on left side to view!):
alkalinity:11
cruise:2
nitrate:10
oxygen:11
ph:4
phosphate:12
salinity:11
silicate:9
tco2:12
- no files! -
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
325019850330_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49HG19971110_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49NZ20051031_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49RY19940707_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49RY19951115_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UP20100417_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UP20100706_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UP20130619_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UP20130731_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UP20160703_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by salinity in subject)
49UF20160408 - salinity
Minimum depth set to 2000m. Accurate data. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-05 13:45:40 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
49HG19971110_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
49NZ20051031_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
49UF20120429_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
49UF20120826_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
49UF20121024_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
49UF20130107_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
49UP20100417_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
49UP20100514_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
49UP20101110_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
49UP20130619_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
49UP20130731_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by tco2 in subject)
49UF20160408 - tco2
Even though the weighted mean might support an adjustment, a closer look reveals
that the most negative offsets are based on only "shallow" data. In contrast
49UP20100514 does show quite an ok match, especially at depth. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-05 13:44:27 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
49NZ20051031_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49UF20120108_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49UF20120429_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49UF20120826_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49UF20130107_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49UP20100417_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49UP20100514_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49UP20101110_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49UP20130619_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49UP20130731_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by alkalinity in subject)
49UF20160408 - alkalinity
Tough call - limited depth and variability of crs offsets makes a robust
conclusion difficult. The two positive crs offsets did not receive a 2nd QC …
roughly 50% of the crs (just) below the limit. Weighted mean clearly within
range though. Not enough for an adjustment. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-05 13:44:49 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
49NZ20051031_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
49UP20101110_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
49UP20130619_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by ph in subject)
49UF20160407 - phosphate
Adjust 1% following RG meeting
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2020-06-10 14:30:46 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20160408 - ph
Only one sign crs with reasonable quality, 49UP20130619, indicating good quality
as does the interconsistency test. However, not enough for a robust 2nd QC.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-05 13:46:23 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20160408 - phosphate
Most crs show a roughly 1% offset as is reflected in the weighted mean offset of
0.988. However, especially the good fit with UF20130107 opposes any adjustment.
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-05 13:45:27 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
49K619960620_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49NZ20051031_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49RY19951115_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UF20130107_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UF20130412_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UF20130627_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UP20130619_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UP20130731_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UP20160703_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by nitrate in subject)
49UF20160408 - nitrate
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2020-03-16 13:21:20 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
49HG19971110_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49NZ20051031_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49RY19940707_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49RY19951115_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UF20120108_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UF20120621_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UF20120826_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UF20130107_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UP20100115_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UP20100706_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UP20130731_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by phosphate in subject)
49UF20160407 - phosphate
Adjust 1% following RG meeting
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2020-06-10 14:30:46 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20160408 - phosphate
Most crs show a roughly 1% offset as is reflected in the weighted mean offset of
0.988. However, especially the good fit with UF20130107 opposes any adjustment.
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-05 13:45:27 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
49NZ20051031_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49RY19940707_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49RY19951115_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UF20120108_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UF20120826_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UF20130107_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UP20100115_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UP20100706_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by silicate in subject)
49UF20160408 - silicate
Accurate data. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-05 13:46:06 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
325019850330_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49HG19971110_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49NZ20051031_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49RY19940707_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49RY19951115_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UP20100417_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UP20100706_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UP20130619_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UP20130731_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UP20160703_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by oxygen in subject)
49UF20160408 - oxygen
Minimum depth set to 2000m. Accuracy even better than crs analysis shows
(artificial offsets due to bad interpolation). Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-05 13:45:06 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
View 10 comment(s) (Lists all comments)
49UF20160407 - phosphate
Adjust 1% following RG meeting
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2020-06-10 14:30:46 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20160408 - nitrate
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2020-03-16 13:21:20 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20160408 - ph
Only one sign crs with reasonable quality, 49UP20130619, indicating good quality
as does the interconsistency test. However, not enough for a robust 2nd QC.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-05 13:46:23 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20160408 - silicate
Accurate data. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-05 13:46:06 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20160408 - salinity
Minimum depth set to 2000m. Accurate data. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-05 13:45:40 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20160408 - phosphate
Most crs show a roughly 1% offset as is reflected in the weighted mean offset of
0.988. However, especially the good fit with UF20130107 opposes any adjustment.
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-05 13:45:27 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20160408 - oxygen
Minimum depth set to 2000m. Accuracy even better than crs analysis shows
(artificial offsets due to bad interpolation). Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-05 13:45:06 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20160408 - alkalinity
Tough call - limited depth and variability of crs offsets makes a robust
conclusion difficult. The two positive crs offsets did not receive a 2nd QC …
roughly 50% of the crs (just) below the limit. Weighted mean clearly within
range though. Not enough for an adjustment. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-05 13:44:49 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20160408 - tco2
Even though the weighted mean might support an adjustment, a closer look reveals
that the most negative offsets are based on only "shallow" data. In contrast
49UP20100514 does show quite an ok match, especially at depth. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-05 13:44:27 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20160408 - initialized
non-GO-SHIP but on GO-SHIP line:P03; Section:OK, PN; Carbon PI:Kazuhiro Nemoto;
Hydrography PI:Kazuhiro Nemoto; Oxygen PI:Kazuhiro Nemoto; Nutrients PI:Kazuhiro
Nemoto
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-04 08:19:34 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Hide comments