Cruise: 49UF20180709 (dataset:GLODAPv2.2020.NEW) Data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Synonyms (including errata!) for this cruise: ks201806; 49UF20180709; ks201806
IMPORTANT information for GLODAP Reference Group Editors: This adjustment is a published version for GLODAPv2.2020!
Please wait while loading list of related files
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
Redfield.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/adjustments!] |
View | |
TSmap.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/adjustments!] |
View |
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
Weighted_Mean_Results.xlsx | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/adjustments!] |
||
Weighted_Mean_Results.xlsx |
Plot/Data files re. Parameter(s) (select parameter on left side to view!):
alkalinity:5
cruise:5
nitrate:12
oxygen:13
ph:8
phosphate:12
salinity:10
silicate:17
tco2:6
- no files! -
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
318M20040615_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
318M20130321_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
32MW19890206_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49NZ20051031_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49RY19940707_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UF20120621_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UF20130627_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UP20150724_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UP20160703_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by salinity in subject)
49UF20180709 - salinity
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2020-02-20 10:17:18 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
49RY19940707_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
49UF20120621_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
49UF20130627_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
49UP20100706_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
49UP20160703_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by tco2 in subject)
49UF20180709 - tco2
Accurate data. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2020-02-20 10:16:29 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
49UF20120621_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49UF20130627_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49UP20100706_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49UP20160703_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by alkalinity in subject)
49UF20180709 - alkalinity
Only 4 deep crs but all clearly within the range. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2020-02-20 10:16:45 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
318M20130321_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
49UF20120621_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
49UF20130107_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
49UF20130627_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
49UP20100706_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
49UP20150724_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
49UP20160703_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by ph in subject)
49UF20180709 - ph
Only four sign. crs for a min depth of 2000m, but a nice agreement is present
with all offset being roughly 0.01. Crs with less crs stations support this
finding. The carbon interconsistency is good though (offste of 0.002). Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2020-02-20 10:19:52 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20180709 - phosphate
The concentrations are rather on the lower side but clearly within the limits
and further note that perfect matches do exist (e.g. with 49UP20160703).
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2020-02-20 10:17:09 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
318M20040615_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
318M20130321_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
325019850330_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
32MW19890206_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49HG19980812_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49NZ20051031_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49RY19940707_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UF20120621_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UF20130627_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UP20150724_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UP20160703_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by nitrate in subject)
49UF20180709 - nitrate
Accurate data. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2020-02-20 10:16:35 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
318M20040615_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
318M20130321_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
32MW19890206_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49NZ20051031_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49RY19940707_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UF20110617_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UF20120621_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UF20130627_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UP20100706_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UP20150724_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UP20160703_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by phosphate in subject)
49UF20180709 - phosphate
The concentrations are rather on the lower side but clearly within the limits
and further note that perfect matches do exist (e.g. with 49UP20160703).
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2020-02-20 10:17:09 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
318M20040615_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
318M20130321_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
325019850330_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
32MW19890206_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49NZ20051031_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49RY19940707_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UF20110617_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UF20120621_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UF20130627_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UP20100706_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UP20150724_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UP20160703_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
si_MLR.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
si_MLR_oxy.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by silicate in subject)
49UF20180709 - silicate
Again silicate seems tricky… All crs offsets are above 1. The great majority
shows an offset between 1% and 2%. It is clearly present at all depth and all
locations (many repeated cruise tracks among crs). Further, MLR analyses support
this finding (again). However due to the spready data (natural) uncertainties
remain. Adjust with doubts and only by 1% downward.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2020-02-20 10:18:14 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
318M20040615_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
318M20130321_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
32MW19890206_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
492S19941101_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49HG19980812_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49NZ20051031_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49RY19940707_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UF20120621_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UF20130627_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UP20150724_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UP20160703_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
si_MLR_oxy.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by oxygen in subject)
49UF20180709 - oxygen
Quite large standard deviations for the chosen min depth, but clearly accurate
data.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2020-02-20 10:16:55 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
View 9 comment(s) (Lists all comments)
49UF20180709 - ph
Only four sign. crs for a min depth of 2000m, but a nice agreement is present
with all offset being roughly 0.01. Crs with less crs stations support this
finding. The carbon interconsistency is good though (offste of 0.002). Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2020-02-20 10:19:52 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20180709 - silicate
Again silicate seems tricky… All crs offsets are above 1. The great majority
shows an offset between 1% and 2%. It is clearly present at all depth and all
locations (many repeated cruise tracks among crs). Further, MLR analyses support
this finding (again). However due to the spready data (natural) uncertainties
remain. Adjust with doubts and only by 1% downward.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2020-02-20 10:18:14 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20180709 - salinity
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2020-02-20 10:17:18 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20180709 - phosphate
The concentrations are rather on the lower side but clearly within the limits
and further note that perfect matches do exist (e.g. with 49UP20160703).
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2020-02-20 10:17:09 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20180709 - oxygen
Quite large standard deviations for the chosen min depth, but clearly accurate
data.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2020-02-20 10:16:55 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20180709 - alkalinity
Only 4 deep crs but all clearly within the range. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2020-02-20 10:16:45 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20180709 - nitrate
Accurate data. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2020-02-20 10:16:35 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20180709 - tco2
Accurate data. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2020-02-20 10:16:29 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20180709 - initialized
original: 49UF20180709; ks201806; Keifu Maru II; Naoki Nagai; NN
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2020-02-18 17:49:52 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Hide comments