Cruise: 49UP20120306 (dataset:GLODAPv2.2020.NEW) Data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Synonyms (including errata!) for this cruise: rf201202; 49UP20120306; rf201202; Section:PT; erratum:49UP20120307
IMPORTANT information for GLODAP Reference Group Editors: This adjustment is a published version for GLODAPv2.2020!
Please wait while loading list of related files
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
Redfield.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/adjustments!] |
View |
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
Weighted_Mean_Results.xlsx |
Plot/Data files re. Parameter(s) (select parameter on left side to view!):
alkalinity:4
cruise:2
nitrate:10
oxygen:11
ph:7
phosphate:10
salinity:12
silicate:10
tco2:4
- no files! -
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
318M20130321_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
325020040424_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
33RR20050617_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49HG19990804_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49K619990523_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49NZ20140717_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49RY20110515_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49RY20120726_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UF20090116_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UP20120602_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UP20140703_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by salinity in subject)
49UP20120307 - salinity
Even the "better" crs have std larger than the sepcified salinity range. A max
depth of 2027m and a max of three samples below 1500m per station is not enouth
for a robust crs analysis/2nd QC.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-05 17:43:39 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
49NZ20050525_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
49RY20110515_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
49WA19960516_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by tco2 in subject)
49UP20120307 - tco2
Only three sign crs of dubious quality due to the limited depth of the
cruise-in-question. Not enough for a 2nd QC.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-05 17:41:25 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
49NZ20050525_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49RY20110515_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49WA19960516_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by alkalinity in subject)
49UP20120307 - alkalinity
Only three sign crs of dubious quality due to the limited depth of the
cruise-in-question. Not enough for a 2nd QC. Note that concentrations seem
rather low….
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-05 17:41:39 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
49NZ20000105_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
49NZ20050525_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
49RY20110515_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
49UP20120602_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
49UP20140703_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
49WA19960516_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by ph in subject)
49UP20120307 - ph
4 out of 6 crs offsets are within the range. All offsets are accompanied by
large std but (maybe) acceptable. The two Mirai cruises indicate a too low pH
value though. The interconsistency is ok but also accompanied by a large std
(0.0088 +/- 0.0179 ) and its quite striking that the interconsistency offset if
almost opposite to the crs results... No reliable conclusion possible....(?)
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-05 17:42:49 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UP20120307 - phosphate
All crs offsets are clearly within the range. Robust 2nd QC - especially given
the few "deep" sampels! Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-05 17:40:44 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
318M20040615_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
318M20130321_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49NZ20070724_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49NZ20140717_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49RY20110515_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49RY20120726_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UF20090116_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UP20120602_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UP20140703_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by nitrate in subject)
49UP20120307 - nitrate
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2020-03-20 19:06:13 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
318M20040615_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49HG19990804_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49NZ20050525_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49NZ20140717_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49RY20110515_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49RY20120726_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UF20090116_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UP20120602_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UP20140703_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by phosphate in subject)
49UP20120307 - phosphate
All crs offsets are clearly within the range. Robust 2nd QC - especially given
the few "deep" sampels! Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-05 17:40:44 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
318M20040615_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
318M20130321_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49NZ20050525_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49NZ20140717_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49RY20110515_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49RY20120726_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UF20090116_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UP20120602_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UP20140703_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by silicate in subject)
49UP20120307 - silicate
More than 95% of the crs offsets are within the range. Std are still acceptable.
All in all no doubts about accuracy (within 2% range). Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-05 17:42:16 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
318M20130321_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49K619990523_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49NZ19990823_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49NZ20070724_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49NZ20140717_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49RY20110515_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49RY20120726_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UF20090116_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UP20120602_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49WA19960516_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by oxygen in subject)
49UP20120307 - oxygen
Even the "better" crs have std as large as the allowed range. A max depth of
2027m and a max of three samples below 1500m per station is not enouth for a
robust crs analysis/2nd QC.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-05 17:41:08 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
View 9 comment(s) (Lists all comments)
49UP20120307 - nitrate
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2020-03-20 19:06:13 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UP20120307 - salinity
Even the "better" crs have std larger than the sepcified salinity range. A max
depth of 2027m and a max of three samples below 1500m per station is not enouth
for a robust crs analysis/2nd QC.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-05 17:43:39 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UP20120307 - ph
4 out of 6 crs offsets are within the range. All offsets are accompanied by
large std but (maybe) acceptable. The two Mirai cruises indicate a too low pH
value though. The interconsistency is ok but also accompanied by a large std
(0.0088 +/- 0.0179 ) and its quite striking that the interconsistency offset if
almost opposite to the crs results... No reliable conclusion possible....(?)
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-05 17:42:49 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UP20120307 - silicate
More than 95% of the crs offsets are within the range. Std are still acceptable.
All in all no doubts about accuracy (within 2% range). Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-05 17:42:16 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UP20120307 - alkalinity
Only three sign crs of dubious quality due to the limited depth of the
cruise-in-question. Not enough for a 2nd QC. Note that concentrations seem
rather low….
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-05 17:41:39 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UP20120307 - tco2
Only three sign crs of dubious quality due to the limited depth of the
cruise-in-question. Not enough for a 2nd QC.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-05 17:41:25 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UP20120307 - oxygen
Even the "better" crs have std as large as the allowed range. A max depth of
2027m and a max of three samples below 1500m per station is not enouth for a
robust crs analysis/2nd QC.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-05 17:41:08 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UP20120307 - phosphate
All crs offsets are clearly within the range. Robust 2nd QC - especially given
the few "deep" sampels! Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-05 17:40:44 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UP20120307 - initialized
Section:PT; Carbon PI:Hitomi Kamiya; Hydrography PI:Hitomi Kamiya; Oxygen
PI:Hitomi Kamiya; Nutrients PI:Hitomi Kamiya
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-04 08:19:36 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Hide comments