Cruise: 49UP20151115 (dataset:GLODAPv2.2020.NEW) Data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Synonyms (including errata!) for this cruise: rf201509; rf201509; 49UP20151115; non-GO-SHIP but on GO-SHIP line:P03; Section:OK;
IMPORTANT information for GLODAP Reference Group Editors: This adjustment is a published version for GLODAPv2.2020!
Please wait while loading list of related files
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
Redfield.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/adjustments!] |
View | |
TSmap.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/adjustments!] |
View |
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
Weighted_Mean_Results.xlsx | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/adjustments!] |
||
Weighted_Mean_Results.xlsx |
Plot/Data files re. Parameter(s) (select parameter on left side to view!):
alkalinity:9
cruise:4
nitrate:10
oxygen:11
ph:4
phosphate:11
salinity:11
silicate:11
tco2:9
- no files! -
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
325019850330_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49HG19971110_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49NZ20051031_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49RY19940707_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49RY19951115_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UP20100417_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UP20100706_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UP20130619_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UP20130731_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UP20160703_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by salinity in subject)
49UP20151115 - salinity
Accurate data. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-06 17:14:27 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
49UF20120108_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
49UF20120429_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
49UF20121024_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
49UF20130107_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
49UF20130412_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
49UP20101110_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
49UP20130619_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
49UP20130731_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by tco2 in subject)
49UP20151115 - tco2
No deep crs present, i.e. only few samples for comparison but still a good
agreement between the different crs. Data seem to be accurate. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-06 17:13:36 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
49NZ20051031_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49UF20120826_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49UF20121024_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49UF20130107_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49UF20130412_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49UP20101110_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49UP20130619_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49UP20130731_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by alkalinity in subject)
49UP20151115 - alkalinity
No deep crs present, i.e. only few samples for comparison and hence a large
variability in offsets. Nevertheless, data seem to be accurate. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-06 17:13:52 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
49NZ20051031_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
49UP20101110_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
49UP20130619_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by ph in subject)
49UP20151115 - ph
Only three sign crs with dubious quality due to the limited comparison depth.
From crs analysis alone a 2nd QC can not be made. Interconsistency check
indicates rather too high values (on/just above the limit) with an offset of
0.0111 +/- 0.0056. Tough call - maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-06 17:14:55 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UP20151115 - phosphate
Maybe slightly offset or at least on the lower side of the spectrum. However,
especially the good fits with 49UP20160703 and both UP2010 cruises clearly do
not justify an adjustment. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-06 17:14:16 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
49K619960620_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49NZ20051031_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49RY19940707_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49RY19951115_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UF20121024_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UF20130107_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UP20130619_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UP20130731_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UP20160703_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by nitrate in subject)
49UP20151115 - nitrate
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2020-03-23 17:45:01 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
325019850330_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49HG19971110_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49NZ20051031_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49RY19940707_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49RY19951115_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UP20100417_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UP20100706_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UP20130619_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UP20130731_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UP20160703_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by phosphate in subject)
49UP20151115 - phosphate
Maybe slightly offset or at least on the lower side of the spectrum. However,
especially the good fits with 49UP20160703 and both UP2010 cruises clearly do
not justify an adjustment. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-06 17:14:16 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
325019850330_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49HG19971110_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49NZ20051031_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49RY19940707_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49RY19951115_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UP20100417_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UP20100706_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UP20130619_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UP20130731_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UP20160703_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by silicate in subject)
49UP20151115 - silicate
Accurate data. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-06 17:14:37 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
325019850330_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49HG19971110_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49NZ20051031_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49RY19940707_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49RY19951115_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UP20100417_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UP20100706_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UP20130619_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UP20130731_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UP20160703_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by oxygen in subject)
49UP20151115 - oxygen
Accurate data. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-06 17:14:00 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
View 9 comment(s) (Lists all comments)
49UP20151115 - nitrate
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2020-03-23 17:45:01 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UP20151115 - ph
Only three sign crs with dubious quality due to the limited comparison depth.
From crs analysis alone a 2nd QC can not be made. Interconsistency check
indicates rather too high values (on/just above the limit) with an offset of
0.0111 +/- 0.0056. Tough call - maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-06 17:14:55 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UP20151115 - silicate
Accurate data. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-06 17:14:37 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UP20151115 - salinity
Accurate data. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-06 17:14:27 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UP20151115 - phosphate
Maybe slightly offset or at least on the lower side of the spectrum. However,
especially the good fits with 49UP20160703 and both UP2010 cruises clearly do
not justify an adjustment. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-06 17:14:16 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UP20151115 - oxygen
Accurate data. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-06 17:14:00 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UP20151115 - alkalinity
No deep crs present, i.e. only few samples for comparison and hence a large
variability in offsets. Nevertheless, data seem to be accurate. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-06 17:13:52 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UP20151115 - tco2
No deep crs present, i.e. only few samples for comparison but still a good
agreement between the different crs. Data seem to be accurate. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-06 17:13:36 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UP20151115 - initialized
non-GO-SHIP but on GO-SHIP line:P03; Section:OK; Carbon PI:Kazuhiro Nemoto;
Hydrography PI:Kazuhiro Nemoto; Oxygen PI:Kazuhiro Nemoto; Nutrients PI:Kazuhiro
Nemoto
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-04 08:19:35 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Hide comments