Cruise: 49UP20160109 (dataset:GLODAPv2.2020.NEW) Data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Synonyms (including errata!) for this cruise: rf201601; rf201601; 49UP20160109; non-GO-SHIP but on GO-SHIP line:P09, P10;
IMPORTANT information for GLODAP Reference Group Editors: This adjustment is a published version for GLODAPv2.2020!
Please wait while loading list of related files
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
Redfield.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/adjustments!] |
View | |
TSmap.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/adjustments!] |
View |
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
Weighted_Mean_Results.xlsx | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/adjustments!] |
||
Weighted_Mean_Results.xlsx |
Plot/Data files re. Parameter(s) (select parameter on left side to view!):
alkalinity:9
cruise:4
nitrate:12
oxygen:11
ph:8
phosphate:12
salinity:11
silicate:10
tco2:11
- no files! -
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
318M20040615_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
318M20130321_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
32MW19890206_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49NZ20051031_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49RY19940707_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UF20120621_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UF20130627_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UP20140728_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UP20150724_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UP20160703_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by salinity in subject)
49UP20160109 - salinity
Accurate data - with a very robust crs analysis. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-08 12:25:32 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
325019931005_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
49NZ20050525_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
49RY19940707_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
49UF20120621_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
49UF20130627_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
49UP19970121_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
49UP20100706_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
49UP20130109_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
49UP20140728_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
49UP20160703_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by tco2 in subject)
49UP20160109 - tco2
All crs offsets are postive and all except UP20140728 and 325019931005 are
around 3-4 umol/kg. The analysis is quite robust and the offsets are relatively
constant with depth. Even if the weighted mean offset of 3.68 umol/kg is just
within the range I suggest to adjust it downward by 3 umol/kg. This improves all
crs offsets and also strongly improves the carbon interconsistency.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-08 12:22:50 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
325019931005_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49NZ20050525_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49UF20120621_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49UF20130627_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49UP20100706_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49UP20130109_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49UP20140728_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49UP20160703_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by alkalinity in subject)
49UP20160109 - alkalinity
Accurate data. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-08 12:23:13 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
49NZ20050525_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
49UF20120621_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
49UF20130627_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
49UP20100706_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
49UP20130109_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
49UP20140728_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
49UP20160703_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by ph in subject)
49UP20160109 - ph
Quite robust crs analysis indicating an ok accuracy. With the adjusted TCO2 an
almost perfect interconsistency is given. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-08 12:26:22 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UP20160109 - phosphate
No reason for an adjustment - the majority of the crs offsets are below 1 but
there are more than enough good fits (e.g. 49UP20160703) to doubt that there is
a bias. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-08 12:25:05 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
318M20040615_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
318M20130321_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
32MW19890206_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49NZ20050525_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49RY19940707_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49RY19951115_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UF20121210_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UF20130627_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UP20140728_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UP20150724_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UP20160703_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by nitrate in subject)
49UP20160109 - nitrate
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2020-03-23 17:43:04 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
318M20040615_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
318M20130321_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
32MW19890206_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49NZ20051031_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49RY19940707_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UF20120621_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UF20130627_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UP20130109_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UP20140728_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UP20150724_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UP20160703_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by phosphate in subject)
49UP20160109 - phosphate
No reason for an adjustment - the majority of the crs offsets are below 1 but
there are more than enough good fits (e.g. 49UP20160703) to doubt that there is
a bias. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-08 12:25:05 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
318M20040615_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
318M20130321_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
32MW19890206_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UF20110617_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UF20120621_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UF20130627_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UP20140728_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UP20150724_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UP20160703_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by silicate in subject)
49UP20160109 - silicate
Accurate data - with a very robust crs analysis. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-08 12:25:45 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
318M20040615_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
318M20130321_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
32MW19890206_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49NZ20051031_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49RY19940707_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UF20120621_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UF20130627_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UP20140728_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UP20150724_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UP20160703_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by oxygen in subject)
49UP20160109 - oxygen
Accurate data - with a very robust crs analysis. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-08 12:23:42 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
View 9 comment(s) (Lists all comments)
49UP20160109 - nitrate
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2020-03-23 17:43:04 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UP20160109 - ph
Quite robust crs analysis indicating an ok accuracy. With the adjusted TCO2 an
almost perfect interconsistency is given. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-08 12:26:22 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UP20160109 - silicate
Accurate data - with a very robust crs analysis. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-08 12:25:45 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UP20160109 - salinity
Accurate data - with a very robust crs analysis. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-08 12:25:32 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UP20160109 - phosphate
No reason for an adjustment - the majority of the crs offsets are below 1 but
there are more than enough good fits (e.g. 49UP20160703) to doubt that there is
a bias. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-08 12:25:05 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UP20160109 - oxygen
Accurate data - with a very robust crs analysis. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-08 12:23:42 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UP20160109 - alkalinity
Accurate data. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-08 12:23:13 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UP20160109 - tco2
All crs offsets are postive and all except UP20140728 and 325019931005 are
around 3-4 umol/kg. The analysis is quite robust and the offsets are relatively
constant with depth. Even if the weighted mean offset of 3.68 umol/kg is just
within the range I suggest to adjust it downward by 3 umol/kg. This improves all
crs offsets and also strongly improves the carbon interconsistency.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-08 12:22:50 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UP20160109 - initialized
non-GO-SHIP but on GO-SHIP line:P09, P10; Carbon PI:Kazuhiro Nemoto; Hydrography
PI:Kazuhiro Nemoto; Oxygen PI:Kazuhiro Nemoto; Nutrients PI:Kazuhiro Nemoto;
Organic PI:Masao Ishii
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-04 08:19:35 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Hide comments