Cruise: 49UP20160608 (dataset:GLODAPv2.2020.NEW) Data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Synonyms (including errata!) for this cruise: rf201605; rf201605; 49UP20160608; non-GO-SHIP but on GO-SHIP line:P13;
IMPORTANT information for GLODAP Reference Group Editors: This adjustment is a published version for GLODAPv2.2020!
Please wait while loading list of related files
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
Redfield.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/adjustments!] |
View | |
TSmap.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/adjustments!] |
View |
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
Weighted_Mean_Results.xlsx | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/adjustments!] |
||
Weighted_Mean_Results.xlsx | |||
Weighted_Mean_Results.xlsx |
Plot/Data files re. Parameter(s) (select parameter on left side to view!):
alkalinity:20
cruise:5
nitrate:9
oxygen:11
ph:10
phosphate:10
salinity:8
silicate:12
tco2:9
- no files! -
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
49HG20000912_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49NZ20081011_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49NZ20140717_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49RY20110515_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49RY20120726_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UF20130531_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UP20120602_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by salinity in subject)
49UP20160608 - salinity
Accurate data with a robust crs analysis. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-08 13:14:23 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
49HG20000912_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
49K619990523_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
49NZ20081011_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
49NZ20140717_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
49RY20110515_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
49RY20120726_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
49UF20130531_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
49UP20120602_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by tco2 in subject)
49UP20160608 - tco2
Accurate data with a robust crs analysis. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-08 13:11:36 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
322019920816_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49HG20000912_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49K619990523_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49NZ19971111_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49NZ19981030_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49NZ20010604_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49NZ20030220_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49NZ20040807_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49NZ20050913_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49NZ20060526_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49NZ20070724_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49NZ20070904_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49NZ20071008_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49NZ20081011_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49NZ20140717_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49RY20110515_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49RY20120726_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49UF20130531_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49UP20120602_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by alkalinity in subject)
49UP20160608 - alkalinity
Quite eveident from the crs analysis that data is biased low. Only 3 out of 19
crs offsets are within the acceptable range but all are still negative and two
of them are even below -2 umol/kg. The agreement between all crs offsets is
striking as well as the offset is constant with depth. However the more recent
crs (younger 2011) show slightly lower offsets. Analysis itself is robust, e.g.
entire cruise track is covered with crs. Adjust according to the more recent
crs.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-08 13:12:52 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
49HG20000912_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
49K619990523_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
49NZ20071008_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
49NZ20081011_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
49NZ20140717_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
49RY20110515_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
49RY20120726_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
49UF20130531_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
49UP20120602_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by ph in subject)
49UP20160608 - ph
A temperol trend in the crs offsets is visible towards a better fit with time.
Hence the weighted mean is too low, i.e. closer to zero. Good fits with the more
recent (younger 2011) crs. Interconsistency check indicates slightly too low
values but the offset of -0.0083 +/- 0.0110 is still within the range and quite
uncertain. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-08 13:15:28 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UP20160608 - phosphate
As the other UP2016 cruises this cruise shows phosphate concentrations rather on
the low side. Further, all crs offsets are still within the acceptable range. No
reason to expect that this cruise is biased. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-08 13:14:03 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
49NZ20070904_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49NZ20071008_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49NZ20081011_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49NZ20140717_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49RY20110515_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49RY20120726_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UF20130531_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UP20120602_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by nitrate in subject)
49UP20160608 - nitrate
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2020-03-23 17:44:42 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
49HG20000912_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49K619990523_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49NZ20071008_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49NZ20081011_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49NZ20140717_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49RY20110515_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49RY20120726_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UF20130531_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UP20120602_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by phosphate in subject)
49UP20160608 - phosphate
As the other UP2016 cruises this cruise shows phosphate concentrations rather on
the low side. Further, all crs offsets are still within the acceptable range. No
reason to expect that this cruise is biased. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-08 13:14:03 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
49HG20000912_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49K619990523_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49NZ20071008_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49NZ20081011_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49NZ20140717_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49RY20110515_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49RY20120726_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UF20130531_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UP19990419_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UP20000420_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UP20120602_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by silicate in subject)
49UP20160608 - silicate
Maybe slightly too high concentrations but not enough evidence to justify an
adjustment. Even though roughly 60% show an offset above 1% and only 1 out of 22
crs has an offset below 1, the standard deviations are just too large for such a
small adjustment. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-08 13:14:56 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
49HG20000912_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49K619990523_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49NZ20070904_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49NZ20071008_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49NZ20081011_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49NZ20140717_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49RY20110515_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49RY20120726_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UF20130531_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UP20120602_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by oxygen in subject)
49UP20160608 - oxygen
Accurate data. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-08 13:13:07 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
View 9 comment(s) (Lists all comments)
49UP20160608 - nitrate
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2020-03-23 17:44:42 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UP20160608 - ph
A temperol trend in the crs offsets is visible towards a better fit with time.
Hence the weighted mean is too low, i.e. closer to zero. Good fits with the more
recent (younger 2011) crs. Interconsistency check indicates slightly too low
values but the offset of -0.0083 +/- 0.0110 is still within the range and quite
uncertain. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-08 13:15:28 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UP20160608 - silicate
Maybe slightly too high concentrations but not enough evidence to justify an
adjustment. Even though roughly 60% show an offset above 1% and only 1 out of 22
crs has an offset below 1, the standard deviations are just too large for such a
small adjustment. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-08 13:14:56 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UP20160608 - salinity
Accurate data with a robust crs analysis. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-08 13:14:23 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UP20160608 - phosphate
As the other UP2016 cruises this cruise shows phosphate concentrations rather on
the low side. Further, all crs offsets are still within the acceptable range. No
reason to expect that this cruise is biased. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-08 13:14:03 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UP20160608 - oxygen
Accurate data. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-08 13:13:07 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UP20160608 - alkalinity
Quite eveident from the crs analysis that data is biased low. Only 3 out of 19
crs offsets are within the acceptable range but all are still negative and two
of them are even below -2 umol/kg. The agreement between all crs offsets is
striking as well as the offset is constant with depth. However the more recent
crs (younger 2011) show slightly lower offsets. Analysis itself is robust, e.g.
entire cruise track is covered with crs. Adjust according to the more recent
crs.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-08 13:12:52 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UP20160608 - tco2
Accurate data with a robust crs analysis. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-08 13:11:36 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UP20160608 - initialized
non-GO-SHIP but on GO-SHIP line:P13; Carbon PI:Kazuhiro Nemoto; Hydrography
PI:Kazuhiro Nemoto; Oxygen PI:Kazuhiro Nemoto; Nutrients PI:Kazuhiro Nemoto
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-04 08:19:35 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Hide comments