Cruise: 49UP20170107 (dataset:GLODAPv2.2020.NEW) Data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Synonyms (including errata!) for this cruise: rf201701; rf201701; 49UP20170107; non-GO-SHIP but on GO-SHIP line:P03; Section:OK, PN;
IMPORTANT information for GLODAP Reference Group Editors: This adjustment is a published version for GLODAPv2.2020!
Please wait while loading list of related files
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
Redfield.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/adjustments!] |
View | |
TSmap.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/adjustments!] |
View |
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
Weighted_Mean_Results.xlsx | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/adjustments!] |
||
Weighted_Mean_Results.xlsx |
Plot/Data files re. Parameter(s) (select parameter on left side to view!):
alkalinity:14
cruise:4
nitrate:11
oxygen:11
ph:12
phosphate:11
salinity:11
silicate:9
tco2:11
- no files! -
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
325019850330_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49HG19971110_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49NZ20051031_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49RY19940707_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49RY19951115_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UP20100417_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UP20100706_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UP20130619_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UP20130731_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UP20160703_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by salinity in subject)
49UP20170107 - salinity
Accurate data. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-08 13:29:05 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
49NZ20051031_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
49UF20120429_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
49UF20120826_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
49UF20121024_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
49UF20130107_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
49UF20130412_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
49UP20100417_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
49UP20101110_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
49UP20130619_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
49UP20130731_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by tco2 in subject)
49UP20170107 - tco2
Even though all sign crs are based on only shallow profiles there is a very good
agreement between all crs offsets and std are not too large. Good matches with
the one deep profile further support this finding. Accurate data. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-08 13:27:39 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
49NZ20051031_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49UF20100524_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49UF20110108_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49UF20120108_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49UF20120429_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49UF20120826_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49UF20121024_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49UF20130107_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49UF20130412_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49UP20100417_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49UP20101110_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49UP20130619_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49UP20130731_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by alkalinity in subject)
49UP20170107 - alkalinity
Ignore UP20100417 (bad crs quality). Further, many of the crs cruises are not
Qced themselves and the sign crs are mostly based on only 3 stations. All of
this limits this analysis in general, e.g. for a "negative" example see the crs
with 49UF20120429. Nonetheless, roughly 70% of the crs offsets are within the
range, as is the absolute weighted mean.... tough call. Maintain with doubts.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-08 13:28:27 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
49NZ20051031_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
49UF20120108_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
49UF20120429_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
49UF20120826_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
49UF20121024_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
49UF20130107_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
49UF20130412_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
49UP20100417_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
49UP20101110_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
49UP20130619_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
49UP20130731_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by ph in subject)
49UP20170107 - ph
As is typical for this region there is a absolute wieghted mean around 0.01.
However note that this analysis is based on only few stations, few Qced cruises
and based on only shallow data…. The carbon interconsistency indicates a very
good match on the other side with an offset of only 0.0019 +/- 0.0054. Maintain
with doubts.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-08 13:29:54 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UP20170107 - phosphate
Concentrations are rather on the low side of the spectrum but clearly no bias to
detect. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-08 13:28:53 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
49HG19971110_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49K619960620_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49NZ20051031_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49RY19940707_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49RY19951115_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UF20121024_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UF20130107_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UP20130619_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UP20130731_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UP20160703_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by nitrate in subject)
49UP20170107 - nitrate
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2020-03-23 17:47:18 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
325019850330_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49HG19971110_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49NZ20051031_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49RY19940707_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49RY19951115_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UP20100417_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UP20100706_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UP20130619_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UP20130731_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UP20160703_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by phosphate in subject)
49UP20170107 - phosphate
Concentrations are rather on the low side of the spectrum but clearly no bias to
detect. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-08 13:28:53 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
49NZ20051031_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49RY19940707_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49RY19951115_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UP20100417_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UP20100706_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UP20130619_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UP20130731_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UP20160703_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by silicate in subject)
49UP20170107 - silicate
Accurate data. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-08 13:29:16 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
325019850330_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49HG19971110_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49NZ20051031_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49RY19940707_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49RY19951115_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UP20100417_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UP20100706_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UP20130619_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UP20130731_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UP20160703_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by oxygen in subject)
49UP20170107 - oxygen
Accurate data. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-08 13:28:39 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
View 9 comment(s) (Lists all comments)
49UP20170107 - nitrate
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2020-03-23 17:47:18 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UP20170107 - ph
As is typical for this region there is a absolute wieghted mean around 0.01.
However note that this analysis is based on only few stations, few Qced cruises
and based on only shallow data…. The carbon interconsistency indicates a very
good match on the other side with an offset of only 0.0019 +/- 0.0054. Maintain
with doubts.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-08 13:29:54 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UP20170107 - silicate
Accurate data. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-08 13:29:16 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UP20170107 - salinity
Accurate data. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-08 13:29:05 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UP20170107 - phosphate
Concentrations are rather on the low side of the spectrum but clearly no bias to
detect. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-08 13:28:53 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UP20170107 - oxygen
Accurate data. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-08 13:28:39 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UP20170107 - alkalinity
Ignore UP20100417 (bad crs quality). Further, many of the crs cruises are not
Qced themselves and the sign crs are mostly based on only 3 stations. All of
this limits this analysis in general, e.g. for a "negative" example see the crs
with 49UF20120429. Nonetheless, roughly 70% of the crs offsets are within the
range, as is the absolute weighted mean.... tough call. Maintain with doubts.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-08 13:28:27 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UP20170107 - tco2
Even though all sign crs are based on only shallow profiles there is a very good
agreement between all crs offsets and std are not too large. Good matches with
the one deep profile further support this finding. Accurate data. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-08 13:27:39 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UP20170107 - initialized
non-GO-SHIP but on GO-SHIP line:P03; Section:OK, PN; Carbon PI:Kazuhiro Nemoto;
Hydrography PI:Kazuhiro Nemoto; Oxygen PI:Kazuhiro Nemoto; Nutrients PI:Kazuhiro
Nemoto
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-04 08:19:35 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Hide comments