Cruise: 49UP20170425 (dataset:GLODAPv2.2020.NEW) Data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Synonyms (including errata!) for this cruise: rf201705; rf201705; 49UP20170425; Section:other;
IMPORTANT information for GLODAP Reference Group Editors: This adjustment is a published version for GLODAPv2.2020!
Please wait while loading list of related files
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
Redfield.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/adjustments!] |
View | |
TSmap.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/adjustments!] |
View |
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
Weighted_Mean_Results.xlsx | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/adjustments!] |
||
Weighted_Mean_Results.xlsx | |||
Weighted_Mean_Results.xlsx |
Plot/Data files re. Parameter(s) (select parameter on left side to view!):
cruise:5
nitrate:9
oxygen:7
phosphate:10
salinity:6
silicate:8
tco2:1
- no files! -
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
318M20040615_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
318M20130321_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
492S19941101_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UF20091022_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UP20060630_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by salinity in subject)
49UP20170425 - salinity
Only three sign crs with comparisons to greater depth, which is needed in this
case (see the other crs offsets, i.e. the large variability). These three sign
crs show a good match. Barely passed 2nd QC. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-08 13:46:44 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
tco2_MLR.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by tco2 in subject)
49UP20170425 - tco2
No sign crs. And only two samples can be used for the MLR analysis. Not enough
for a 2nd QC.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-08 13:44:43 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
View comment(s) (filtered by alkalinity in subject)
49UP20170425 - alkalinity
No sign crs. And only two samples can be used for the MLR analysis. Not enough
for a 2nd QC.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-08 13:45:28 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
View comment(s) (filtered by ph in subject)
49UP20170425 - ph
No crs analysis possible. The other carbon parameters could also not be 2nd
Qced... The carbon interconsistency check is very good though.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-08 13:47:51 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UP20170425 - phosphate
All crs offsets within range - also the ones based on only shallow data.
Accurate - maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-08 13:46:27 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
318M20040615_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
318M20130321_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UF20020625_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UF20030225_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UF20040120_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UF20060118_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UF20070117_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UF20091022_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by nitrate in subject)
49UP20170425 - nitrate
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2020-03-23 17:47:36 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
318M20040615_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
318M20130321_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49RY19951115_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UF20020625_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UF20030225_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UF20040120_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UF20060118_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UF20070117_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UF20091022_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by phosphate in subject)
49UP20170425 - phosphate
All crs offsets within range - also the ones based on only shallow data.
Accurate - maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-08 13:46:27 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
318M20040615_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
318M20130321_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49K619940107_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49RY19951115_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UF20060118_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UF20070117_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UF20091022_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by silicate in subject)
49UP20170425 - silicate
Only two robust crs (both 318M cruises). However, all crs offsets are within the
range and especially at depth (even if just compared to one profile) the offsets
seem to diminish. Maintain with doubts.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-08 13:47:13 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
318M20040615_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
318M20130321_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
492S19941101_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49RY19951115_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UF20070117_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UF20091022_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by oxygen in subject)
49UP20170425 - oxygen
Only three sign crs with comparisons to greater depth, which is needed in this
case (see the other crs offsets, i.e. the large variability). These three sign
crs show a good match. Barely passed 2nd QC. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-08 13:46:03 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
View 9 comment(s) (Lists all comments)
49UP20170425 - nitrate
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2020-03-23 17:47:36 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UP20170425 - ph
No crs analysis possible. The other carbon parameters could also not be 2nd
Qced... The carbon interconsistency check is very good though.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-08 13:47:51 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UP20170425 - silicate
Only two robust crs (both 318M cruises). However, all crs offsets are within the
range and especially at depth (even if just compared to one profile) the offsets
seem to diminish. Maintain with doubts.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-08 13:47:13 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UP20170425 - salinity
Only three sign crs with comparisons to greater depth, which is needed in this
case (see the other crs offsets, i.e. the large variability). These three sign
crs show a good match. Barely passed 2nd QC. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-08 13:46:44 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UP20170425 - phosphate
All crs offsets within range - also the ones based on only shallow data.
Accurate - maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-08 13:46:27 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UP20170425 - oxygen
Only three sign crs with comparisons to greater depth, which is needed in this
case (see the other crs offsets, i.e. the large variability). These three sign
crs show a good match. Barely passed 2nd QC. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-08 13:46:03 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UP20170425 - alkalinity
No sign crs. And only two samples can be used for the MLR analysis. Not enough
for a 2nd QC.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-08 13:45:28 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UP20170425 - tco2
No sign crs. And only two samples can be used for the MLR analysis. Not enough
for a 2nd QC.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2019-09-08 13:44:43 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UP20170425 - initialized
Section:other; Carbon PI:Kazuhiro Nemoto; Hydrography PI:Kazuhiro Nemoto; Oxygen
PI:Kazuhiro Nemoto; Nutrients PI:Kazuhiro Nemoto
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-04 08:19:36 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Hide comments