Cruise: 64PE20071026 (dataset:GLODAPv2.2020.NEW) Data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Synonyms (including errata!) for this cruise: PE278; 64PE20071026; PE278
IMPORTANT information for GLODAP Reference Group Editors: This adjustment is a published version for GLODAPv2.2020!
Please wait while loading list of related files
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
Redfield.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/adjustments!] |
View | |
TSmap.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/adjustments!] |
View |
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
Weighted_Mean_Results.xlsx | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/adjustments!] |
||
Weighted_Mean_Results.xlsx |
Plot/Data files re. Parameter(s) (select parameter on left side to view!):
cfc12:2
cruise:5
nitrate:1
oxygen:5
phosphate:2
salinity:1
silicate:5
- no files! -
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by salinity in subject)
64PE20071026 - salinity
Maintain, but note that this is not a perfect example of a nice crs analysis…
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2020-02-20 12:10:12 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
View comment(s) (filtered by ph in subject)
64PE20071026 - phosphate
Even more uncertain than nitrate with not only large standard deviations but
also a large variability present. However, some perfect matches are present
(e.g. 33RO2013), the weighted total mean is very close to 1 and the data fits ok
to nitrate. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2020-02-20 12:10:44 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by nitrate in subject)
64PE20071026 - nitrate
Large uncertainties present at most crs. Nonetheless, quite good matches exist
and the great majority of offsets is within the range. Even clearer when
analysis is performed on density surfaces. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2020-02-20 12:10:59 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
o2_MLR_po.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by phosphate in subject)
64PE20071026 - phosphate
Even more uncertain than nitrate with not only large standard deviations but
also a large variability present. However, some perfect matches are present
(e.g. 33RO2013), the weighted total mean is very close to 1 and the data fits ok
to nitrate. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2020-02-20 12:10:44 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
si_MLR.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
si_MLR_po.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by silicate in subject)
64PE20071026 - silicate
Adjust upward : RG meeting
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2020-06-10 14:47:03 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
64PE20071026 - silicate
Very difficult to give a reliable conclusion…
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2020-02-20 12:10:27 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
o2_MLR.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
o2_MLR_po.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by oxygen in subject)
64PE20071026 - oxygen
Bad data : RG meeting
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2020-06-10 14:47:18 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
64PE20071026 - oxygen
Not enough deep profiles for a reliable crs analysis. MLR suggests borderline ok
accuracy though (mean offset of roughly 1.5%). Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2020-02-20 12:11:13 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
CFC-12-saturation.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/cfc12!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by cfc12 in subject)
64PE20071026 - cfc12
Few surface samples but the ones present are clearly within limits. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2020-02-20 12:11:36 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
View comment(s) (filtered by cfc11 in subject)
64PE20071026 - cfc11
All data flagged questionable or bad…
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2020-02-20 12:11:26 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
View 11 comment(s) (Lists all comments)
64PE20071026 - oxygen
Bad data : RG meeting
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2020-06-10 14:47:18 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
64PE20071026 - silicate
Adjust upward : RG meeting
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2020-06-10 14:47:03 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
64PE20071026
Reference Group meeting results:
Exclude O2 data and adjust silicate 3% upward following weighted mean offset.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2020-04-01 16:27:49 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
64PE20071026 - cfc12
Few surface samples but the ones present are clearly within limits. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2020-02-20 12:11:36 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
64PE20071026 - cfc11
All data flagged questionable or bad…
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2020-02-20 12:11:26 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
64PE20071026 - oxygen
Not enough deep profiles for a reliable crs analysis. MLR suggests borderline ok
accuracy though (mean offset of roughly 1.5%). Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2020-02-20 12:11:13 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
64PE20071026 - nitrate
Large uncertainties present at most crs. Nonetheless, quite good matches exist
and the great majority of offsets is within the range. Even clearer when
analysis is performed on density surfaces. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2020-02-20 12:10:59 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
64PE20071026 - phosphate
Even more uncertain than nitrate with not only large standard deviations but
also a large variability present. However, some perfect matches are present
(e.g. 33RO2013), the weighted total mean is very close to 1 and the data fits ok
to nitrate. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2020-02-20 12:10:44 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
64PE20071026 - silicate
Very difficult to give a reliable conclusion…
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2020-02-20 12:10:27 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
64PE20071026 - salinity
Maintain, but note that this is not a perfect example of a nice crs analysis…
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2020-02-20 12:10:12 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
64PE20071026 - initialized
original: 64PE20071026; PE278; Pelagia; Dagmar Kieke; NN
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2020-02-18 17:49:53 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Hide comments